↓ Skip to main content

Special issue on “Applications of neutrosophic theory in decision making-recent advances and future trends”

Overview of attention for article published in Complex & Intelligent Systems, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Special issue on “Applications of neutrosophic theory in decision making-recent advances and future trends”
Published in
Complex & Intelligent Systems, October 2019
DOI 10.1007/s40747-019-00127-1
Authors

Mohamed Abdel-Basset, Florentin Smarandache, Jun Ye

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 33%
Lecturer 1 33%
Student > Master 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 2 67%
Engineering 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2019.
All research outputs
#18,695,869
of 23,170,347 outputs
Outputs from Complex & Intelligent Systems
#62
of 85 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,408
of 360,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Complex & Intelligent Systems
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,170,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 85 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,753 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them