You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Precision mapping of snail habitat provides a powerful indicator of human schistosomiasis transmission
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1903698116 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chelsea L. Wood, Susanne H. Sokolow, Isabel J. Jones, Andrew J. Chamberlin, Kevin D. Lafferty, Armand M. Kuris, Merlijn Jocque, Skylar Hopkins, Grant Adams, Julia C. Buck, Andrea J. Lund, Ana E. Garcia-Vedrenne, Evan Fiorenza, Jason R. Rohr, Fiona Allan, Bonnie Webster, Muriel Rabone, Joanne P. Webster, Lydie Bandagny, Raphaël Ndione, Simon Senghor, Anne-Marie Schacht, Nicolas Jouanard, Gilles Riveau, Giulio A. De Leo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 22 | 34% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 11% |
| Rwanda | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 28 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 38 | 59% |
| Scientists | 22 | 34% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 151 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 18% |
| Researcher | 22 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 14% |
| Unknown | 43 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 35 | 23% |
| Unknown | 49 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 286. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2023.
All research outputs
#123,993
of 25,537,395 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#2,610
of 103,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,477
of 377,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#65
of 913 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,537,395 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,321 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 913 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.