You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Tumors diagnosed as cerebellar glioblastoma comprise distinct molecular entities
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Neuropathologica Communications, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40478-019-0801-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Annekathrin Reinhardt, Damian Stichel, Daniel Schrimpf, Christian Koelsche, Annika K. Wefers, Azadeh Ebrahimi, Philipp Sievers, Kristin Huang, M. Belén Casalini, Francisco Fernández-Klett, Abigail Suwala, Michael Weller, Dorothee Gramatzki, Joerg Felsberg, Guido Reifenberger, Albert Becker, Volkmar H. Hans, Marco Prinz, Ori Staszewski, Till Acker, Hildegard Dohmen, Christian Hartmann, Werner Paulus, Katharina Heß, Benjamin Brokinkel, Jens Schittenhelm, Rolf Buslei, Martina Deckert, Christian Mawrin, Ekkehard Hewer, Ute Pohl, Zane Jaunmuktane, Sebastian Brandner, Andreas Unterberg, Daniel Hänggi, Michael Platten, Stefan M. Pfister, Wolfgang Wick, Christel Herold-Mende, Andrey Korshunov, David E. Reuss, Felix Sahm, David T. W. Jones, David Capper, Andreas von Deimling |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 33% |
| Mexico | 2 | 22% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 11% |
| France | 1 | 11% |
| Spain | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 1 | 11% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 14% |
| Researcher | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 18% |
| Unknown | 21 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 30% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 24 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2020.
All research outputs
#2,424,711
of 25,380,089 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica Communications
#366
of 1,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,644
of 370,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica Communications
#28
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,380,089 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,576 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.