↓ Skip to main content

Amelioration of TMAO through probiotics and its potential role in atherosclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Amelioration of TMAO through probiotics and its potential role in atherosclerosis
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, October 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00253-019-10142-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ahmad Ud Din, Adil Hassan, Yuan Zhu, Tieying Yin, Hans Gregersen, Guixue Wang

Abstract

Atherosclerosis is a major cause of mortalities and morbidities worldwide. It is associated with hyperlipidemia and inflammation, and become chronic by triggering metabolites in different metabolic pathways. Disturbance in the human gut microbiota is now considered a critical factor in the atherosclerosis. Trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO) attracts attention and is regarded as a vital contributor in the development of atherosclerosis. TMAO is generated from its dietary precursors choline, carnitine, and phosphatidylcholine by gut microbiota into an intermediate compound known as trimethylamine (TMA), which is then oxidized into TMAO by hepatic flavin monooxygenases. The present review focus on advances in TMAO preventing strategies through probiotics, including, modulation of gut microbiome, metabolomics profile, miRNA, or probiotic antagonistic abilities. Furthermore, possible recommendations based on relevant literature have been presented, which could be applied in probiotics and atherosclerosis-preventing strategies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Other 5 7%
Student > Master 5 7%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 29 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 33 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2022.
All research outputs
#2,929,355
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#412
of 8,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,312
of 365,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#2
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,795 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.