You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Hydrothermal Vents and Methane Seeps: Rethinking the Sphere of Influence
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Marine Science, May 2016
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmars.2016.00072 |
Authors |
Lisa A. Levin, Amy R. Baco, David A. Bowden, Ana Colaco, Erik E. Cordes, Marina R. Cunha, Amanda W. J. Demopoulos, Judith Gobin, Benjamin M. Grupe, Jennifer Le, Anna Metaxas, Amanda N. Netburn, Greg W. Rouse, Andrew R. Thurber, Verena Tunnicliffe, Cindy Lee Van Dover, Ann Vanreusel, Les Watling |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 6 | 15% |
United States | 5 | 13% |
Canada | 3 | 8% |
Switzerland | 2 | 5% |
Australia | 2 | 5% |
France | 1 | 3% |
Trinidad and Tobago | 1 | 3% |
Hong Kong | 1 | 3% |
Guinea-Bissau | 1 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 10% |
Unknown | 13 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 27 | 69% |
Scientists | 11 | 28% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 478 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Greece | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 470 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 98 | 21% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 74 | 15% |
Student > Master | 64 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 50 | 10% |
Other | 23 | 5% |
Other | 61 | 13% |
Unknown | 108 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 106 | 22% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 84 | 18% |
Environmental Science | 79 | 17% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 30 | 6% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 9 | 2% |
Other | 42 | 9% |
Unknown | 128 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 192. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2023.
All research outputs
#202,797
of 25,079,481 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#111
of 10,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,899
of 341,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#1
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,079,481 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,416 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,624 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.