↓ Skip to main content

Are Changes in Gait and Balance Across the Disease Step Rating Scale in Multiple Sclerosis Statistically Significant and Clinically Meaningful?

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Are Changes in Gait and Balance Across the Disease Step Rating Scale in Multiple Sclerosis Statistically Significant and Clinically Meaningful?
Published in
Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, April 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.03.020
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katrina L. Williams, Nancy L. Low Choy, Sandra G. Brauer

Abstract

To explore differences in gait endurance, speed and standing balance in people with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) across the Disease Step Rating Scale (DSRS), and to determine if differences are statistically significant and clinically meaningful. Observational Study. 222 community dwelling people with MS (Mean age 48 ± 12 years; 32% male) INTERVENTION: Not applicable: Main Outcome Measures: Participants were categorised using the DSRS. Demographics and clinical measures of gait endurance (6 minute walk test - 6MWT), gait speed (10 meter walk test - 10MWT; 25foot walk test - 25FWT) and balance (Berg Balance Scale - BBS) were recorded in one session. Differences in these parameters across categories of the DSRS were explored and clinically meaningful differences identified. The 6MWT showed a greater number of significant differences across adjacent Disease Steps in those with less disability (p < 0.001), while the 10MWT and 25FWT demonstrated more significant changes in those with greater disability (p < 0.001). The BBS demonstrated significant differences across the span of the DSRS categories (p < 0.001). Differences in gait and balance between adjacent DSRS categories met most previously established levels of minimally detectable change and all minimally important change scores. Out findings support the DSRS is an observational tool that can be used by health professionals to categorise people with MS, with the categories reflective of statistically significant and clinically meaningful differences in gait and balance performance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 79 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 15%
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Other 7 9%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 19 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 15 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 18%
Sports and Recreations 7 9%
Neuroscience 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 26 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2016.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
#2,899
of 6,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,304
of 313,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
#48
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,026 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,306 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.