↓ Skip to main content

Revisiting the Twin Deficits Hypothesis: The Effect of Fiscal Consolidation on the Current Account

Overview of attention for article published in IMF Economic Review, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
Title
Revisiting the Twin Deficits Hypothesis: The Effect of Fiscal Consolidation on the Current Account
Published in
IMF Economic Review, December 2011
DOI 10.1057/imfer.2011.21
Authors

John Bluedorn, Daniel Leigh

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 63 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 18%
Student > Master 9 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Researcher 5 8%
Professor 5 8%
Other 14 22%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 43 66%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 12 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2019.
All research outputs
#8,347,517
of 24,954,788 outputs
Outputs from IMF Economic Review
#145
of 251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,228
of 252,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IMF Economic Review
#9
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,954,788 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 251 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,644 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.