↓ Skip to main content

Proarrhythmic Risk with Antipsychotic and Antidepressant Drugs

Overview of attention for article published in Drugs & Aging, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
Title
Proarrhythmic Risk with Antipsychotic and Antidepressant Drugs
Published in
Drugs & Aging, September 2012
DOI 10.2165/11318880-000000000-00000
Pubmed ID
Authors

W. Victor R. Vieweg, Mark A. Wood, Antony Fernandez, Mary Beatty-Brooks, Mehrul Hasnain, Anand K. Pandurangi

Abstract

The quinidine-like effects of some antidepressant drugs (particularly tricyclic antidepressants) and many antipsychotic drugs (particularly the phenothiazines) confound treatment of psychosis and depression in patients with major mental illness. This is especially true among elderly patients with existing risk factors for corrected QT (QTc) interval prolongation. We used PubMed, previously reported review articles and the extensive personal files of the authors to identify cases of subjects aged>or=60 years who developed QTc interval prolongation, polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (PVT)/torsade de pointes (TdP) and/or sudden cardiac death while taking antipsychotic or antidepressant drugs or a combination of these medications. We identified 37 patients who had taken, in total, 46 antipsychotic or antidepressant drugs. Our most striking finding was that almost four-fifths of our cases involved women. When the 14 critically ill subjects receiving haloperidol intravenously were excluded, 91.3% of our subjects were women. Almost three-quarters of our study subjects had cardiovascular disease. Intravenous administration of haloperidol in the critically ill and profoundly agitated elderly warrants particular comment. Of the 14 subjects in this category identified, six were men and eight were women. In 13 cases, the drug dose far exceeded the 2 mg necessary to produce an antipsychotic effect. These clinicians were using an agent to achieve sedation that usually requires very high doses in the critically ill and profoundly agitated elderly to achieve this effect. Inclusion criteria for our literature review required antipsychotic and/or antidepressant drug-induced QTc interval prolongation. Even so, our finding that 31 of our 37 subjects developed PVT is sobering. However, the reader should not conclude that drug-induced QTc interval prolongation is highly predictive of PVT or its TdP subtype. All of our study subjects had at least two risk factors for TdP, with age and sex being the most common. We included the rare case of a patient with congenital long QT syndrome who developed further lengthening of the QTc interval and TdP when prescribed an antidepressant drug well known to produce QTc interval prolongation. We conclude with recommendations for clinicians not expert in the specialty of cardiology to deal with the many questions raised in this review. Specifically, such clinicians treating elderly patients with antipsychotic and antidepressant drugs that may prolong the QTc interval should aggressively obtain a baseline ECG for elderly female patients with additional risk factors such as personal or family history of pre-syncope or syncope, electrolyte disturbances or cardiovascular disease. Elderly male patients are also subject to QTc interval prolongation when such risk factors are present. It is important that the clinicians themselves inspect ECGs. If the QT interval is more than half the RR interval, QTc interval prolongation is likely to be present. In such cases, a cardiology colleague interested in QTc interval issues and TdP should be asked to review the ECG. Finally, nothing in our recommendations replaces meticulous attention to US FDA guidelines in the package insert of each drug.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Lebanon 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 84 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 13%
Researcher 9 10%
Other 8 9%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Other 22 25%
Unknown 19 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 50%
Psychology 8 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 23 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2019.
All research outputs
#7,960,693
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Drugs & Aging
#552
of 1,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,481
of 189,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drugs & Aging
#156
of 449 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,293 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 449 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.