| Title |
Do-not-intubate orders in patients with acute respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-019-05828-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael E. Wilson, Aniket Mittal, Bibek Karki, Claudia C. Dobler, Abdul Wahab, J. Randall Curtis, Patricia J. Erwin, Abdul M. Majzoub, Victor M. Montori, Ognjen Gajic, M. Hassan Murad |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 19% |
| Australia | 2 | 13% |
| Philippines | 1 | 6% |
| Mexico | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 69% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 13% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Researcher | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 18% |
| Unknown | 32 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 11% |
| Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Psychology | 3 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 34 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2022.
All research outputs
#3,754,901
of 25,378,799 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,201
of 5,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,298
of 370,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#68
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,378,799 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,396 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.