| Title |
To Watch is to Work: a Review of NeuroImaging Data on Tool Use Observation Network
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neuropsychology Review, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11065-019-09418-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emanuelle Reynaud, Jordan Navarro, Mathieu Lesourd, François Osiurak |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 11% |
| Australia | 3 | 8% |
| Germany | 2 | 5% |
| Kuwait | 1 | 3% |
| Czechia | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Israel | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 17 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 32 | 86% |
| Scientists | 3 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 21% |
| Researcher | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 19% |
| Unknown | 12 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 10 | 23% |
| Psychology | 7 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 13 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,671,843
of 24,996,701 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychology Review
#54
of 490 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,930
of 369,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychology Review
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,996,701 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 490 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,793 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.