| Title |
Microsatellite records for volume 8, issue 1
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Genetics Resources, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12686-016-0522-2 |
| Authors |
Maria Cristina Arias, Stéphane Aulagnier, Erin F. Baerwald, Robert M. R. Barclay, Jacqueline Silva Batista, Rochelle R. Beasley, Rodrigo A. Bezerra, Frédéric Blanc, Eli S. Bridge, Maria Teresa Cabria, Lívia Izabela Caputo, Jie Chen, Jian-Hua Chen, Zhi Chen, Ching-Hung Chen, Pengfei Chu, Andrea Contina, Fausto Moreira da Silva Carmo, Leiliane Campos de Carvalho, Priscila Maria de Freitas Viana, Jeferson Luis Vasconcelos de Macêdo, Gabriel de Menezes Yazbeck, Zélia de Oliveira Teixeira, Natália de Souza Araujo, Gabriel Dequigiovanni, Shaoxiong Ding, Priscila Karla Ferreira Dos Santos, Holly B. Ernest, Yan-Wei Feng, Kyara Martins Formiga, Christine Fournier-Chambrillon, Elaine Françoso, Yaru Fu, Roderick B. Gagne, Fernanda A. Gaiotto, Tian-xiang Gao, Hongzi Ge, Taiming Ge, François Gillet, Yun Gong, Hong-mei Gong, Qiqiang Guo, Liang Guo, Liang Guo, Ryan J. Harrigan, Libo He, Carrie J. House, Chung- Der Hsiao, Rong Huang, Arati Iyengar, Xiayun Jiang, Hai-Lin Jiang, Tania A. Johnson, Kenneth L. Jones, Paulo Yoshio Kageyama, Jeffrey F. Kelly, Lydia Lam, Stacey L. Lance, Hong Li, Cheng Li, Fugui Li, Huie Li, Shaoke Li, Yongming Li, Mingming Li, Mingming Li, Fuhua Li, Wei-guo Li, Jitao Li, Jian Li, Xinru Li, Kai Liang, Yaosi Liang, Fuchu Liao, Lanjie Liao, Haoran Lin, Haoran Lin, Haoran Lin, Qiang Lin, Hong Liu, Honggao Liu, Lu Liu, Xiang-Quan Liu, Ping Liu, Chen Liu, Xin Liu, Maria Teresa Gomes Lopes, Danqi Lu, Ming-Bao Luan, Wei Luo, Zining Meng, Zining Meng, Johan R. Michaux, Mélanie Némoz, John P. Pollinger, Ye Qiao, Hongyue Qu, Santiago Linorio Ferreyra Ramos, Stephné Le Roux, Leandro Rodrigues Santiago, Xiaoyan Shao, Kang-Ning Shen, Heding Shen, Hao Shen, Thomas B. Smith, Dang-yu Song, Eric Sourp, Yiwen Sun, Huiyuan Tang, Qing Tang, Yiqin Tong, Marion van den Einden, Moniek J. C. van Hoppe, Elizabeth Ann Veasey, Corinne Vial-Novella, Li Wan, Xiaojun Wang, Yiming Wang, Yu Wang, Yaping Wang, Ruoran Wang, Xin Wang, Rifang Wang, Quanchao Wang, Guo-dong Wang, Jiajia Wang, Dongfeng Wang, Peipei Wang, Xiu-Mei Wei, Yanfei Wen, Haishen Wen, Xue-Ping Wu, Xin Wu, Jianhai Xiang, Zhenzhen Xie, Zhanning Xu, Pao Xu, Zhi Yang, Sen Yang, Sen Yang, Cece Yin, Shaowu Yin, Shaowu Yin, Yang Yu, Xiping Yuan, Gen Hua Yue, Gong-Gu Zang, Rafael Zardoya, Li-hui Zhang, Xiaojun Zhang, Yong Zhang, Guosong Zhang, Yan- di Zhang, Hongye Zhang, Guosong Zhang, Jie Zhao, Cheng Zhao, Fei Zhu, Hongchai Zhu, Shilong Zhu, Shuming Zou |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 26 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 19% |
| Researcher | 5 | 19% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Unknown | 4 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 56% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 19% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 6 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2016.
All research outputs
#20,322,106
of 22,865,319 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics Resources
#307
of 344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,138
of 300,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics Resources
#8
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,865,319 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 344 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,851 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.