| Title |
Venous Vascular Closure System Versus Manual Compression Following Multiple Access Electrophysiology Procedures The AMBULATE Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacep.2019.08.013 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrea Natale, Sanghamitra Mohanty, P.Y. Liu, Suneet Mittal, Amin Al-Ahmad, David B. De Lurgio, Rodney Horton, William Spear, Shane Bailey, Jared Bunch, Dan Musat, Padraig O’Neill, Steven Compton, Mintu P. Turakhia, AMBULATE Trial Investigators, Andrea Natale, Amin M. Al-Ahmad, Rodney Paul Horton, Shane M. Bailey, Deborah S. Cardinal, Steven Compton, Krzysztof W. Balaban, Deidre Rambur, Suneet Mittal, Mark W. Preminger, Dan Laurentiu Musat, Tina Claudia Sichrovsky, Advay G. Bhatt, Kimberly Michel, David B. DeLurgio, Anand D. Shah, Nino Kavtaradze, Padraig Gearoid O'Neill, Shelley Allen, William H. Spear, Manoj Duggal, Diane Braun, Frederick T. Han, Nassir F. Marrouche, Mihail G. Chelu, Andrew M. Rivera, T. Jared Bunch, Jonathan Peter Weiss, John D. Day, Brian G. Crandall, Michael J. Cutler, Meredith Allen, Roderick Tung, Andrew D. Beaser, Shahram Sarrafi, Manish Hasmukh Shah, Sung W. Lee, Margaret Bell Fischer, Athanasios Thomaides, Sarfraz A.K. Durrani, David Abraham Strouse, Zayd A. Eldadah, Shine Kim, Gregory G. Bashian, Przemyslaw Peter Borek, James Darby, Srinivas Rao Dukkipati, William Whang, Jacob Sam Koruth, Marc A. Miller, Vivek Y. Reddy, Felicia Biondo, Mohan N. Viswanathan, Sarah Magee |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 52% |
| Argentina | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 65% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 17% |
| Scientists | 3 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 75 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 5% |
| Researcher | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 17% |
| Unknown | 36 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 38 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,468,312
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#316
of 1,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,953
of 377,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#7
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,557 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.