↓ Skip to main content

Identification of an Apis cerana cerana MAP kinase phosphatase 3 gene (AccMKP3) in response to environmental stress

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Stress and Chaperones, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Identification of an Apis cerana cerana MAP kinase phosphatase 3 gene (AccMKP3) in response to environmental stress
Published in
Cell Stress and Chaperones, October 2019
DOI 10.1007/s12192-019-01036-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuzhen Chao, Chen Wang, Haihong Jia, Na Zhai, Hongfang Wang, Baohua Xu, Han Li, Xingqi Guo

Abstract

MAP kinase phosphatase 3 (MKP3), a member of the dual-specificity protein phosphatase (DUSP) superfamily, has been widely studied for its role in development, cancer, and environmental stress in many organisms. However, the functions of MKP3 in various insects have not been well studied, including honeybees. In this study, we isolated an MKP3 gene from Apis cerana cerana and explored the role of this gene in the resistance to oxidation. We found that AccMKP3 is highly conserved in different species and shares the closest evolutionary relationship with AmMKP3. We determined the expression patterns of AccMKP3 under various stresses. qRT-PCR results showed that AccMKP3 was highly expressed during the pupal stages and in adult muscles. We further found that AccMKP3 was induced in all the stress treatments. Moreover, we discovered that the enzymatic activities of peroxidase, superoxide dismutase, and catalase increased and that the expression levels of several antioxidant genes were affected after AccMKP3 was knocked down. Collectively, these results suggest that AccMKP3 may be associated with antioxidant processes involved in response to various environmental stresses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Student > Postgraduate 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2019.
All research outputs
#17,252,457
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Cell Stress and Chaperones
#413
of 699 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,784
of 377,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Stress and Chaperones
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 699 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.