↓ Skip to main content

Does lipid-correction introduce biases into isotopic mixing models? Implications for diet reconstruction studies

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
Title
Does lipid-correction introduce biases into isotopic mixing models? Implications for diet reconstruction studies
Published in
Oecologia, October 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00442-019-04525-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin C. Arostegui, Daniel E. Schindler, Gordon W. Holtgrieve

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 82 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 23%
Student > Master 14 17%
Researcher 14 17%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 15 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 41%
Environmental Science 24 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Physics and Astronomy 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 17 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2019.
All research outputs
#15,585,448
of 23,170,347 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#3,284
of 4,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,534
of 362,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#47
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,170,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.