↓ Skip to main content

Heart rate reduction with esmolol is associated with improved arterial elastance in patients with septic shock: a prospective observational study

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
Title
Heart rate reduction with esmolol is associated with improved arterial elastance in patients with septic shock: a prospective observational study
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00134-016-4351-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Morelli, M. Singer, V. M. Ranieri, A. D’Egidio, L. Mascia, A. Orecchioni, F. Piscioneri, F. Guarracino, E. Greco, M. Peruzzi, G. Biondi-Zoccai, G. Frati, S. M. Romano

Abstract

Ventricular-arterial (V-A) decoupling decreases myocardial efficiency and is exacerbated by tachycardia that increases static arterial elastance (Ea). We thus investigated the effects of heart rate (HR) reduction on Ea in septic shock patients using the beta-blocker esmolol. We hypothesized that esmolol improves Ea by positively affecting the tone of arterial vessels and their responsiveness to HR-related changes in stroke volume (SV). After at least 24 h of hemodynamic optimization, 45 septic shock patients, with an HR ≥95 bpm and requiring norepinephrine to maintain mean arterial pressure (MAP) ≥65 mmHg, received a titrated esmolol infusion to maintain HR between 80 and 94 bpm. Ea was calculated as MAP/SV. All measurements, including data from right heart catheterization, echocardiography, arterial waveform analysis, and norepinephrine requirements, were obtained at baseline and at 4 h after commencing esmolol. Esmolol reduced HR in all patients and this was associated with a decrease in Ea (2.19 ± 0.77 vs. 1.72 ± 0.52 mmHg l(-1)), arterial dP/dt max (1.08 ± 0.32 vs. 0.89 ± 0.29 mmHg ms(-1)), and a parallel increase in SV (48 ± 14 vs. 59 ± 18 ml), all p < 0.05. Cardiac output and ejection fraction remained unchanged, whereas norepinephrine requirements were reduced (0.7 ± 0.7 to 0.58 ± 0.5 µg kg(-1) min(-1), p < 0.05). HR reduction with esmolol effectively improved Ea while allowing adequate systemic perfusion in patients with severe septic shock who remained tachycardic despite standard volume resuscitation. As Ea is a major determinant of V-A coupling, its reduction may contribute to improving cardiovascular efficiency in septic shock.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 2%
Unknown 119 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 17%
Student > Postgraduate 13 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Other 10 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 7%
Other 33 27%
Unknown 23 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 72 60%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 29 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2022.
All research outputs
#4,027,602
of 23,009,818 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,108
of 5,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,749
of 299,998 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#21
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,009,818 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,016 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,998 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.