Title |
Understanding heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: where are we today?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Netherlands Heart Journal, February 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/s12471-016-0810-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
L. van Heerebeek, W. J. Paulus |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Singapore | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 148 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 20 | 13% |
Researcher | 19 | 13% |
Student > Master | 15 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 9% |
Other | 30 | 20% |
Unknown | 29 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 61 | 41% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 7% |
Engineering | 5 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 3% |
Other | 19 | 13% |
Unknown | 35 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2018.
All research outputs
#957,462
of 22,865,319 outputs
Outputs from Netherlands Heart Journal
#17
of 514 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,745
of 298,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Netherlands Heart Journal
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,865,319 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 514 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,878 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.