↓ Skip to main content

Surgical treatment of zygomatic bone fracture using two points fixation versus three point fixation-a randomised prospective clinical trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
Title
Surgical treatment of zygomatic bone fracture using two points fixation versus three point fixation-a randomised prospective clinical trial
Published in
Trials, April 2012
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-13-36
Pubmed ID
Authors

Majeed Rana, Riaz Warraich, Salman Tahir, Asifa Iqbal, Constantin von See, André M Eckardt, Nils-Claudius Gellrich

Abstract

The zygoma plays an important role in the facial contour for both cosmetic and functional reasons; therefore zygomatic bone injuries should be properly diagnosed and adequately treated. Comparison of various surgical approaches and their complications can only be done objectively using outcome measurements which in turn require protocol management and long-term follow up. The preference for open reduction and internal fixation of zygomatic fractures at three points has continued to grow in response to observations of inadequate results from two point and one point fixation techniques.The objectives of this study were to compare the efficacy of zygomatic bone after treatment with ORIF using 2 point fixation and ORIF using 3 point fixation and compare the outcome of two procedures.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
Korea, Republic of 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 89 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 23 25%
Student > Master 12 13%
Other 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Researcher 9 10%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 15 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 67%
Engineering 5 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Psychology 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 17 18%