| Title |
Expert Recommendations on Cardiac Computed Tomography for Planning Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.08.054 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kasper Korsholm, Sergio Berti, Xavier Iriart, Jacqueline Saw, Dee Dee Wang, Hubert Cochet, Danny Chow, Alberto Clemente, Ole De Backer, Jesper Møller Jensen, Jens Erik Nielsen-Kudsk |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 25% |
| Spain | 14 | 23% |
| Denmark | 3 | 5% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 3 | 5% |
| Colombia | 2 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 13 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33 | 55% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 18% |
| Scientists | 10 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 126 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 17% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 18% |
| Unknown | 44 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 40% |
| Engineering | 9 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 48 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2023.
All research outputs
#809,455
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
#237
of 4,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,996
of 377,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
#8
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,042 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.