| Title |
Evaluating the impact of patients' online access to doctors' visit notes: designing and executing the OpenNotes project
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6947-12-32 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Suzanne G Leveille, Janice Walker, James D Ralston, Stephen E Ross, Joann G Elmore, Tom Delbanco |
| Abstract |
Providers and policymakers are pursuing strategies to increase patient engagement in health care. Increasingly, online sections of medical records are viewable by patients though seldom are clinicians' visit notes included. We designed a one-year multi-site trial of online patient accessible office visit notes, OpenNotes. We hypothesized that patients and primary care physicians (PCPs) would want it to continue and that OpenNotes would not lead to significant disruptions to doctors' practices. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 44% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Argentina | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 24% |
| Scientists | 3 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 148 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 37 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 36 | 22% |
| Unknown | 23 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 36% |
| Computer Science | 18 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 9% |
| Psychology | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 14% |
| Unknown | 29 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2021.
All research outputs
#1,188,848
of 25,346,731 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#44
of 2,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,000
of 167,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#2
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,346,731 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,243 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.