| Title |
Higher body fat percentage is associated with enhanced temperature perception in NAFLD: results from the randomised Wessex Evaluation of fatty Liver and Cardiovascular markers in NAFLD with OMacor thErapy trial (WELCOME) trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Diabetologia, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00125-016-3966-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Geraldine F. Clough, Keith G. McCormick, Eleonora Scorletti, Lokpal Bhatia, Philip C. Calder, Michael J. Griffin, Christopher D. Byrne |
| Abstract |
The effect of n-3 fatty acid treatment on temperature perception as a sensory nerve function modality is uncertain. In patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) both with and without type 2 diabetes, we: (1) tested whether 15-18 months' treatment with 4 g/day of docosahexaenoic plus eicosapentaenoic acid (DHA+EPA) improved hot (HPT) and cold (CPT) temperature perception thresholds and (2) explored factors associated with HPT and CPT, in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The effect of treatment (n = 44) on HPT, CPT and temperature perception index (TPI: difference between HPT and CPT) was measured at the big toe in 90 individuals without neuropathy (type 2 diabetes; n = 30). Participants were randomised 1:1, using sequential numbering, by personnel independent from the trial team. All participants and all members of the research team were blinded to group assignment. Data were collected in the Southampton National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre. Treatment effects and the independence of associations were testing by regression modelling. Mean ± SD age was 50.9 ± 10.6 years. In men (n = 53) and women (n = 37), HPTs (°C) were 46.1 ± 5.1 and 43.1 ± 6.4 (p = 0.02), CPTs (°C) were 22.7 ± 3.4 and 24.5 ± 3.6 (p = 0.07) and TPIs (°C) were 23.4 ± 7.4 and 18.7 ± 9.5 (p = 0.008), respectively. In univariate analyses, total body fat percentage (measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry [DXA]) was associated with HPT (r = -0.36 p = 0.001), CPT (r = 0.35 p = 0.001) and TPI (r = 0.39 p = 0.0001). In multivariable-adjusted regression models, adjusting for age, sex and other potential confounders, only body fat percentage was independently associated with HPT, CPT or TPI (p = 0.006, p = 0.006 and p = 0.002, respectively). DHA+EPA treatment did not modify HPT, CPT or TPI (p = 0.93, p = 0.44 and p = 0.67, respectively). There were no important adverse effects or side effects reported. Higher body fat percentage is associated with enhanced temperature perception. There was no benefit of treatment with high-dose n-3 fatty acids on the thresholds to detect hot or cold stimuli. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00760513 FUNDING: This work was supported by the National Institute for Health Research through the NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Unit grant and by a Diabetes UK allied health research training fellowship awarded to KMcC (Diabetes UK. BDA 09/0003937). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 16% |
| Researcher | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 26 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 11% |
| Sports and Recreations | 6 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 28 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2016.
All research outputs
#12,894,140
of 22,865,319 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#4,106
of 5,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,640
of 299,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#61
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,865,319 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,037 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.7. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,001 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.