| Title |
Cost-utility Analysis of Opportunistic and Systematic Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Strategies from the Perspective of the Brazilian Public Healthcare System
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40258-019-00528-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ângela J. Ben, Jeruza L. Neyeloff, Camila F. de Souza, Ana Paula O. Rosses, Aline L. de Araujo, Adriana Szortika, Franciele Locatelli, Gabriela de Carvalho, Cristina R. Neumann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 90 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 40 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 29% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 43 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2019.
All research outputs
#18,695,869
of 23,170,347 outputs
Outputs from Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
#618
of 788 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#271,251
of 362,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
#19
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,170,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 788 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.