↓ Skip to main content

Use of the Breakthrough Series Collaborative to Support Broad and Sustained Use of Evidence-Based Trauma Treatment for Children in Community Practice Settings

Overview of attention for article published in Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
Title
Use of the Breakthrough Series Collaborative to Support Broad and Sustained Use of Evidence-Based Trauma Treatment for Children in Community Practice Settings
Published in
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, April 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10488-011-0347-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lori Ebert, Lisa Amaya-Jackson, Jan M. Markiewicz, Cassandra Kisiel, John A. Fairbank

Abstract

Empirically supported treatments for posttraumatic stress reactions in children are not widely available. This observational study evaluates the feasibility and utility of adapting the Institute for Healthcare's Breakthrough Series Collaborative (BSC) to support the broad implementation and sustained use of Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (TF-CBT) in community practice settings. Study findings indicated that agency staff in diverse roles viewed the BSC methodology as a valuable and practicable approach for facilitating skillful delivery of TF-CBT with fidelity. Use of TF-CBT increased over the course of the collaborative and findings from a survey conducted one year later indicated that participating agencies were able to sustain and spread the practice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Unknown 95 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 12%
Student > Master 10 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 7%
Other 19 20%
Unknown 17 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 44 45%
Social Sciences 13 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 20 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2022.
All research outputs
#4,662,554
of 24,717,692 outputs
Outputs from Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
#158
of 687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,138
of 114,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,717,692 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 687 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.