You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The neonatal period: A missed opportunity for the prevention of iron deficiency and its associated neurological consequences?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Bulletin, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1111/nbu.12407 |
| Authors |
E. K. McCarthy, M. E. Kiely |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 9 | 43% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 24% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 52% |
| Scientists | 5 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 24% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 17 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 8% |
| Psychology | 3 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 19 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2019.
All research outputs
#2,263,342
of 23,377,816 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Bulletin
#163
of 597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,324
of 364,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Bulletin
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,377,816 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 597 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,080 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.