Title |
Assessing the potential of culture-independent 16S rRNA microbiome analysis in disease diagnostics: the example of Dianthus gratianopolitanus and Robbsia andropogonis
|
---|---|
Published in |
European Journal of Plant Pathology, October 2019
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10658-019-01850-8 |
Authors |
Marco Enrique Mechan-Llontop, Long Tian, Vivian Bernal-Galeano, Ella Reeves, Mary Ann Hansen, Elizabeth Ann Bush, Boris Alexander Vinatzer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 45% |
France | 2 | 18% |
Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 8 | 73% |
Members of the public | 3 | 27% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 36% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 21% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 7% |
Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 7% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 3 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 57% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 7% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 7% |
Psychology | 1 | 7% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 7% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 2 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2019.
All research outputs
#4,047,338
of 23,170,347 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Plant Pathology
#78
of 950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,427
of 363,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Plant Pathology
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,170,347 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 950 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,105 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.