↓ Skip to main content

Biomarkers for Parkinson’s Disease: How Good Are They?

Overview of attention for article published in Neuroscience Bulletin, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
205 Mendeley
Title
Biomarkers for Parkinson’s Disease: How Good Are They?
Published in
Neuroscience Bulletin, October 2019
DOI 10.1007/s12264-019-00433-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tianbai Li, Weidong Le

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 205 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 12%
Student > Bachelor 22 11%
Researcher 14 7%
Student > Master 14 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 4%
Other 25 12%
Unknown 97 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 23 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 8%
Chemistry 7 3%
Engineering 7 3%
Other 31 15%
Unknown 101 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2019.
All research outputs
#4,258,822
of 23,170,347 outputs
Outputs from Neuroscience Bulletin
#137
of 789 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,027
of 360,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroscience Bulletin
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,170,347 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 789 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,844 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.