↓ Skip to main content

When Evaluators Get It Wrong: False Positive IDs and Parental Alienation

Overview of attention for article published in Psychology, Public Policy and Law, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 530)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
31 news outlets
twitter
21 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
When Evaluators Get It Wrong: False Positive IDs and Parental Alienation
Published in
Psychology, Public Policy and Law, February 2020
DOI 10.1037/law0000216
Authors

Richard A. Warshak

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 18%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Other 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 16 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 15 31%
Social Sciences 11 22%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 18 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 257. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2022.
All research outputs
#142,581
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Psychology, Public Policy and Law
#4
of 530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,617
of 470,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychology, Public Policy and Law
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 530 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 470,256 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them