↓ Skip to main content

Insights into Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells in Inflammatory Diseases

Overview of attention for article published in Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Insights into Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells in Inflammatory Diseases
Published in
Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00005-015-0342-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yewon Kwak, Hye-Eun Kim, Sung Gyoo Park

Abstract

Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) are a heterogeneous population of cells involved in immune regulation. This population subdivides into granulocytic MDSCs and monocytic MDSCs, which regulate immune responses via the production of various molecules including reactive oxygen species, nitric oxide, arginase-1, interleukin-10, and transforming growth factor-β. Most studies of MDSCs focused on their role in tumors. MDSCs protect tumor cells from immune responses, and thus the frequency of MDSCs associates with poor prognosis. Many recent studies reported an important role for MDSCs in inflammatory diseases via the regulation of immune cells. In addition, the utilization of MDSCs by infectious pathogens suggests an immune evasion mechanism. Thus, MDSCs are important immune regulators in inflammatory diseases, as well as in tumors. This review focuses on the role of MDSCs in the regulation of inflammation in non-tumor settings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 28 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 21%
Researcher 5 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 7 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 21%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 10 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2018.
All research outputs
#5,763,116
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis
#70
of 396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,700
of 267,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 396 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.