↓ Skip to main content

Feasibility of external rhythmic cueing with the Google Glass for improving gait in people with Parkinson’s disease

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
279 Mendeley
Title
Feasibility of external rhythmic cueing with the Google Glass for improving gait in people with Parkinson’s disease
Published in
Journal of Neurology, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00415-016-8115-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yan Zhao, Jorik Nonnekes, Erik J. M. Storcken, Sabine Janssen, Erwin E. H. van Wegen, Bastiaan R. Bloem, Lucille D. A. Dorresteijn, Jeroen P. P. van Vugt, Tjitske Heida, Richard J. A. van Wezel

Abstract

New mobile technologies like smartglasses can deliver external cues that may improve gait in people with Parkinson's disease in their natural environment. However, the potential of these devices must first be assessed in controlled experiments. Therefore, we evaluated rhythmic visual and auditory cueing in a laboratory setting with a custom-made application for the Google Glass. Twelve participants (mean age = 66.8; mean disease duration = 13.6 years) were tested at end of dose. We compared several key gait parameters (walking speed, cadence, stride length, and stride length variability) and freezing of gait for three types of external cues (metronome, flashing light, and optic flow) and a control condition (no-cue). For all cueing conditions, the subjects completed several walking tasks of varying complexity. Seven inertial sensors attached to the feet, legs and pelvis captured motion data for gait analysis. Two experienced raters scored the presence and severity of freezing of gait using video recordings. User experience was evaluated through a semi-open interview. During cueing, a more stable gait pattern emerged, particularly on complicated walking courses; however, freezing of gait did not significantly decrease. The metronome was more effective than rhythmic visual cues and most preferred by the participants. Participants were overall positive about the usability of the Google Glass and willing to use it at home. Thus, smartglasses like the Google Glass could be used to provide personalized mobile cueing to support gait; however, in its current form, auditory cues seemed more effective than rhythmic visual cues.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 279 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 277 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 47 17%
Student > Master 41 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 11%
Researcher 22 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 5%
Other 39 14%
Unknown 87 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 41 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 36 13%
Neuroscience 29 10%
Engineering 14 5%
Sports and Recreations 12 4%
Other 43 15%
Unknown 104 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2017.
All research outputs
#4,671,681
of 22,865,319 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#1,199
of 4,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,336
of 298,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#31
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,865,319 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,479 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.