↓ Skip to main content

Explaining participation in Earth Hour: the identity perspective and the theory of planned behavior

Overview of attention for article published in Climatic Change, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Explaining participation in Earth Hour: the identity perspective and the theory of planned behavior
Published in
Climatic Change, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10584-019-02554-y
Authors

Hoi-Wing Chan, Vivien Pong, Kim-Pong Tam

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 14%
Lecturer 5 11%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Other 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 18 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 9 20%
Social Sciences 3 7%
Arts and Humanities 2 5%
Philosophy 2 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 5%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 18 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2019.
All research outputs
#15,585,448
of 23,170,347 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#5,364
of 5,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,981
of 363,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#68
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,170,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,831 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,756 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.