↓ Skip to main content

Activation of different neural precursor populations in the adult hippocampus: Does this lead to new neurons with discrete functions?

Overview of attention for article published in Developmental Neurobiology, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Activation of different neural precursor populations in the adult hippocampus: Does this lead to new neurons with discrete functions?
Published in
Developmental Neurobiology, June 2012
DOI 10.1002/dneu.22027
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dhanisha J. Jhaveri, Chanel J. Taylor, Perry F. Bartlett

Abstract

Resident populations of stem and precursor cells drive the production of new neurons in the adult hippocampus. Recent discoveries have highlighted that a large proportion of these precursor cells are in fact quiescent and can be activated by distinct neuronal activity under both normal physiological and pathological conditions. As growing evidence indicates that newborn neurons play a critical role in cognitive functions such as learning and memory and in mood regulation, it is paramount that we obtain a better understanding of how the reservoirs of stem and precursor cells are maintained and activated. In this review, we critically examine the roles of key molecular mechanisms that have been shown to regulate hippocampal precursor cells, especially their activation. We believe that understanding the mechanistic details of the activity-driven regulation of precursor cells will equip us with the ability to develop tailored strategies to trigger the generation of new neurons, thereby improving the functional outcomes in various neurological and psychiatric conditions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 4%
Netherlands 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 50 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 20%
Researcher 11 20%
Student > Master 9 16%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 6 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 15 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 18%
Psychology 5 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 6 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2012.
All research outputs
#19,869,877
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Developmental Neurobiology
#462
of 635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,383
of 170,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Developmental Neurobiology
#17
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 635 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,114 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.