↓ Skip to main content

Lipid-based nanocarriers for oral peptide delivery

Overview of attention for article published in Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
5 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
210 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
304 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lipid-based nanocarriers for oral peptide delivery
Published in
Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, April 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.addr.2016.04.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhigao Niu, Inmaculada Conejos-Sánchez, Brendan T. Griffin, Caitriona M. O’Driscoll, María J. Alonso

Abstract

This article is aimed to overview the lipid-based nanostructures designed so far for the oral administration of peptides and proteins, and to analyze the influence of their composition and physicochemical (particle size, zeta potential) and pharmaceutical (drug loading and release) properties, on their interaction with the gastro-intestinal environment, and the subsequent PK/PD profile of the associated drugs. The ultimate goal has been to highlight and comparatively analyze the key factors that may be determinant of the success of these nanocarriers for oral peptide delivery. The article ends with some prospects on the challenges to be addressed for the intended commercial success of these delivery vehicles.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 304 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 304 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 67 22%
Student > Master 51 17%
Researcher 27 9%
Student > Bachelor 23 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 4%
Other 46 15%
Unknown 78 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 92 30%
Chemistry 28 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 4%
Other 33 11%
Unknown 96 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2023.
All research outputs
#3,274,799
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
#459
of 3,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,573
of 316,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
#14
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,237 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,337 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.