| Title |
Developing the New Interventions for independence in Dementia Study (NIDUS) theoretical model for supporting people to live well with dementia at home for longer: a systematic review of theoretical models and Randomised Controlled Trial evidence
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00127-019-01784-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kathryn Lord, Jules Beresford-Dent, Penny Rapaport, Alex Burton, Monica Leverton, Kate Walters, Iain Lang, Murna Downs, Jill Manthorpe, Sue Boex, Joy Jackson, Margaret Ogden, Claudia Cooper |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 13 | 59% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 64% |
| Scientists | 5 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 126 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 13% |
| Researcher | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 15% |
| Unknown | 48 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 10% |
| Psychology | 10 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 12% |
| Unknown | 50 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,248,921
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#222
of 2,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,824
of 365,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#7
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,534 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,983 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.