You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Structure and mechanism of diet specialisation: testing models of individual variation in resource use with sea otters
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecology Letters, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01760.x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M. Tim Tinker, Paulo R. Guimarães, Mark Novak, Flavia Maria Darcie Marquitti, James L. Bodkin, Michelle Staedler, Gena Bentall, James A. Estes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 420 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 17 | 4% |
| Brazil | 9 | 2% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Japan | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 2% |
| Unknown | 374 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 92 | 22% |
| Researcher | 82 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 72 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 27 | 6% |
| Other | 65 | 15% |
| Unknown | 46 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 249 | 59% |
| Environmental Science | 81 | 19% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 1% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 2% |
| Unknown | 66 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2012.
All research outputs
#20,356,726
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Ecology Letters
#3,084
of 3,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,428
of 171,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology Letters
#38
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.4. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.