↓ Skip to main content

A chasmataspidid affinity for the putative xiphosuran Kiaeria Størmer, 1934

Overview of attention for article published in PalZ, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
wikipedia
10 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
A chasmataspidid affinity for the putative xiphosuran Kiaeria Størmer, 1934
Published in
PalZ, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s12542-019-00493-8
Authors

James C. Lamsdell

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 25%
Student > Master 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 25%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2023.
All research outputs
#3,917,151
of 24,522,750 outputs
Outputs from PalZ
#90
of 669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,930
of 370,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PalZ
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,522,750 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 669 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.