↓ Skip to main content

Potential Processes Involved in the Initiation and Maintenance of Whiplash-Associated Disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Spine, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Potential Processes Involved in the Initiation and Maintenance of Whiplash-Associated Disorders
Published in
Spine, December 2011
DOI 10.1097/brs.0b013e318238853f
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michele Sterling, Samuel A. McLean, Michael J. L. Sullivan, James M. Elliott, Jan Buitenhuis, Steven J. Kamper

Abstract

Nonsystematic review and discussion of the etiological processes involved in whiplash-associated disorders (WAD).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Netherlands 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 81 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 17%
Student > Master 15 17%
Researcher 10 11%
Other 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 20 23%
Unknown 16 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 16%
Psychology 8 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Sports and Recreations 2 2%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 23 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2012.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Spine
#6,653
of 8,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,838
of 246,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Spine
#87
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.