| Title |
Periodontopathogenic microbiota, infectious mechanisms and preterm birth: analysis with structural equations (cohort—BRISA)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00404-019-05355-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elisa Miranda Costa, Camilla Silva de Araujo Figueiredo, Rafiza Félix Marão Martins, Cecília Claudia Costa Ribeiro, Claudia Maria Coelho Alves, Maria Lúcia Talarico Sesso, Ruchele Dias Nogueira, Maria da Conceição Saraiva, Marco Antônio Barbieri, Heloisa Bettiol, Antônio Augusto Moura da Silva, Erika Bárbara Abreu Fonseca Thomaz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 18 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 18 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2021.
All research outputs
#3,810,288
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
#193
of 2,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,118
of 365,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
#5
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,066 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.