↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcome After Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Therapy in Patients With Chagas Heart Disease

Overview of attention for article published in JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcome After Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Therapy in Patients With Chagas Heart Disease
Published in
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, August 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.jacep.2019.07.003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fabio Mahamed Rassi, Lucas Minohara, Anis Rassi, Luis Claudio Lemos Correia, José Antonio Marin-Neto, Anis Rassi, Antonio da Silva Menezes

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 17%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Librarian 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 10 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 37%
Engineering 3 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Psychology 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 10 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2023.
All research outputs
#14,396,821
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#1,217
of 1,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,796
of 349,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#42
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,735 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.