Title |
Strategies for increasing participation in mail-out colorectal cancer screening programs: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Systematic Reviews, November 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13643-019-1170-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Belinda C. Goodwin, Michael J. Ireland, Sonja March, Larry Myers, Fiona Crawford-Williams, Suzanne K. Chambers, Joanne F. Aitken, Jeff Dunn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 17% |
Canada | 1 | 17% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
Other | 16 | 25% |
Unknown | 20 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 27% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 14% |
Psychology | 7 | 11% |
Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 6% |
Unknown | 23 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2023.
All research outputs
#4,733,857
of 23,917,011 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#939
of 2,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,812
of 367,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#27
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,917,011 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,070 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.