↓ Skip to main content

The surgical anatomy of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve in the inguinal region: a meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Hernia, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
Title
The surgical anatomy of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve in the inguinal region: a meta-analysis
Published in
Hernia, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10029-016-1493-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

K. A. Tomaszewski, P. Popieluszko, B. M. Henry, J. Roy, B. Sanna, M. R. Kijek, J. A. Walocha

Abstract

Several variations in the anatomy and injury of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) have been studied since 1885. The aim of our study was to analyze the available data on the LFCN and find a true prevalence to help in the planning and execution of surgical procedures in the area of the pelvis, namely inguinal hernia repair. A search of the major medical databases was performed for LFCN anatomy. The anatomical data were collected and analyzed. Twenty-four studies (n = 1,720) were included. The most common pattern of the LFCN exiting the pelvis was medial to the Sartorius as a single branch. When it exited in this pattern, it did so on average 1.90 cm medial to the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS). The LFCN and its variations are important to consider especially during inguinal hernia repair, abdominoplasty, and iliac bone grafting. We suggest maintaining a distance of 3 cm or more from the ASIS when operating to prevent injury to the LFCN.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 107 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Researcher 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Student > Master 8 7%
Other 26 24%
Unknown 38 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Sports and Recreations 3 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 <1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 46 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2023.
All research outputs
#5,268,162
of 25,758,211 outputs
Outputs from Hernia
#200
of 1,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,876
of 313,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hernia
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,286 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,241 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.