You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Impacts of case management for frail elderly people: A qualitative study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, April 2009
|
DOI | 10.1258/jhsrp.2008.007142 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rod Sheaff, Ruth Boaden, Penny Sargent, Susan Pickard, Hugh Gravelle, Stuart Parker, Martin Roland |
Abstract |
To assess the impacts of different forms of case management for people aged over 65 years at risk of unplanned hospital admission, in particular the impacts upon patients, carers and health service organization in English primary care; and, in these respects, compare the Evercare model with alternatives. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 50% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 86 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 16 | 18% |
Researcher | 11 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 11% |
Professor | 7 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
Other | 20 | 23% |
Unknown | 17 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 31% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 19% |
Social Sciences | 12 | 14% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 6% |
Psychology | 2 | 2% |
Other | 7 | 8% |
Unknown | 18 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2015.
All research outputs
#6,586,660
of 23,305,591 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Health Services Research & Policy
#328
of 682 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,600
of 95,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Health Services Research & Policy
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,305,591 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 682 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,168 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.