↓ Skip to main content

Intravenous versus intravenous/oral antibiotics for perforated appendicitis in pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pediatrics, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Intravenous versus intravenous/oral antibiotics for perforated appendicitis in pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
BMC Pediatrics, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12887-019-1799-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chuan Wang, Yanan Li, Yi Ji

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 11%
Student > Master 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 17 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 22 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2020.
All research outputs
#4,652,282
of 23,170,347 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#840
of 3,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,810
of 364,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#29
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,170,347 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,567 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.