↓ Skip to main content

fMRI analysis on the GPU—Possibilities and challenges

Overview of attention for article published in Computer Methods & Programs in Biomedicine, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 2,060)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
patent
3 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
fMRI analysis on the GPU—Possibilities and challenges
Published in
Computer Methods & Programs in Biomedicine, August 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.cmpb.2011.07.007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anders Eklund, Mats Andersson, Hans Knutsson

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) makes it possible to non-invasively measure brain activity with high spatial resolution. There are however a number of issues that have to be addressed. One is the large amount of spatio-temporal data that needs to be processed. In addition to the statistical analysis itself, several preprocessing steps, such as slice timing correction and motion compensation, are normally applied. The high computational power of modern graphic cards has already successfully been used for MRI and fMRI. Going beyond the first published demonstration of GPU-based analysis of fMRI data, all the preprocessing steps and two statistical approaches, the general linear model (GLM) and canonical correlation analysis (CCA), have been implemented on a GPU. For an fMRI dataset of typical size (80 volumes with 64×64×22voxels), all the preprocessing takes about 0.5s on the GPU, compared to 5s with an optimized CPU implementation and 120s with the commonly used statistical parametric mapping (SPM) software. A random permutation test with 10,000 permutations, with smoothing in each permutation, takes about 50s if three GPUs are used, compared to 0.5-2.5h with an optimized CPU implementation. The presented work will save time for researchers and clinicians in their daily work and enables the use of more advanced analysis, such as non-parametric statistics, both for conventional fMRI and for real-time fMRI.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 4%
Germany 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Italy 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 101 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 30%
Researcher 26 22%
Student > Master 12 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 5%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 13 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 21 18%
Engineering 20 17%
Psychology 17 15%
Neuroscience 17 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 20 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,433,499
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Computer Methods & Programs in Biomedicine
#12
of 2,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,301
of 134,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Computer Methods & Programs in Biomedicine
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,060 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 134,359 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them