↓ Skip to main content

Novel promoters that induce specific transgene expression during the green to ripening stages of tomato fruit development

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Cell Reports, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Novel promoters that induce specific transgene expression during the green to ripening stages of tomato fruit development
Published in
Plant Cell Reports, April 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00299-012-1257-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kyoko Hiwasa-Tanase, Hirofumi Kuroda, Tadayoshi Hirai, Koh Aoki, Kenichi Takane, Hiroshi Ezura

Abstract

Fruit-specific promoters have been used as genetic engineering tools for studies on molecular mechanism of fruit development and advance in fruit quality and additional value by increasing functional component. Especially fruit-ripening specific promoters have been well utilized and studied in tomato; however, few studies have reported the development of promoters that act at fruit developing stages such as immature green and mature green periods. In this study, we report novel promoters for gene expression during the green to ripening stages of tomato fruit development. Genes specifically expressed at tomato fruit were selected using microarray data. Subsequent to confirmation of the expression of the selected 12 genes, upstream DNA fragments of the genes LA22CD07, Les.3122.2.A1_a_at and LesAffx.6852.1.S1_at which specifically expressed at fruit were isolated from tomato genomic DNA as promoter regions. Isolated promoter regions were fused with the GUS gene and the resultant constructs were introduced into tomato by agrobacterium-mediated transformation for evaluation of promoter activity in tomato fruit. The two promoters of LA22CD07, and LesAffx.6852.1.S1_at showed strong activity in the fruit, weak activity in the flower and undetectable activity in other tissues. Unlike well-known fruit-ripening specific promoters, such as the E8 promoter, these promoters exhibited strong activity in green fruit in addition to red-ripening fruit, indicating that the promoters are suitable for transgene expression during green to ripening stages of tomato fruit development.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 27%
Student > Master 10 17%
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Professor 3 5%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 9 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 58%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 8%
Computer Science 2 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 10 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2012.
All research outputs
#15,242,847
of 22,664,267 outputs
Outputs from Plant Cell Reports
#1,735
of 2,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,647
of 161,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Cell Reports
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,267 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,175 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.