Title |
Predicting growth and habitat responses of Ginkgo biloba L. to climate change
|
---|---|
Published in |
Annals of Forest Science , October 2019
|
DOI | 10.1007/s13595-019-0885-0 |
Authors |
Ying Guo, Yue Lu, Yousry A. El-Kassaby, Lei Feng, Guibing Wang, Tongli Wang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 16% |
Professor | 2 | 8% |
Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
Researcher | 2 | 8% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Unknown | 8 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 36% |
Environmental Science | 4 | 16% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
Psychology | 1 | 4% |
Energy | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 9 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2019.
All research outputs
#6,601,876
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Forest Science
#473
of 942 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,622
of 377,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Forest Science
#12
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 942 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.