You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Subpopulation Triage: How to Allocate Conservation Effort among Populations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Biology, June 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00918.x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
EVE McDONALD‐MADDEN, PETER W.J. BAXTER, HUGH P. POSSINGHAM |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 283 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 9 | 3% |
| United States | 6 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 2% |
| Australia | 4 | 1% |
| India | 4 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 2% |
| Unknown | 242 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 74 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 49 | 17% |
| Other | 22 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 46 | 16% |
| Unknown | 25 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 161 | 57% |
| Environmental Science | 77 | 27% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 1% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 1% |
| Unknown | 29 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2012.
All research outputs
#5,161,299
of 25,391,701 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#1,965
of 4,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,984
of 96,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#29
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,391,701 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,050 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.