↓ Skip to main content

Concise review of genus Chondracanthus (Rhodophyta: Gigartinales)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Phycology, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Concise review of genus Chondracanthus (Rhodophyta: Gigartinales)
Published in
Journal of Applied Phycology, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10811-019-01956-w
Authors

Cristian Bulboa Contador, Ignacio Pérez Massad, Loretto Contreras-Porcia, Javier Zapata, Francisco Castañeda, María Eliana Ramírez, Patricia Gil-Kodaka

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 27%
Professor 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Student > Master 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 15 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Chemical Engineering 2 4%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 18 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2020.
All research outputs
#12,822,197
of 23,172,045 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Phycology
#797
of 2,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,940
of 366,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Phycology
#7
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,172,045 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,566 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.