↓ Skip to main content

Does Hypohydration Really Impair Endurance Performance? Methodological Considerations for Interpreting Hydration Research

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
92 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
225 Mendeley
Title
Does Hypohydration Really Impair Endurance Performance? Methodological Considerations for Interpreting Hydration Research
Published in
Sports Medicine, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s40279-019-01188-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lewis J. James, Mark P. Funnell, Ruth M. James, Stephen A. Mears

Abstract

The impact of alterations in hydration status on human physiology and performance responses during exercise is one of the oldest research topics in sport and exercise nutrition. This body of work has mainly focussed on the impact of reduced body water stores (i.e. hypohydration) on these outcomes, on the whole demonstrating that hypohydration impairs endurance performance, likely via detrimental effects on a number of physiological functions. However, an important consideration, that has received little attention, is the methods that have traditionally been used to investigate how hypohydration affects exercise outcomes, as those used may confound the results of many studies. There are two main methodological limitations in much of the published literature that perhaps make the results of studies investigating performance outcomes difficult to interpret. First, subjects involved in studies are generally not blinded to the intervention taking place (i.e. they know what their hydration status is), which may introduce expectancy effects. Second, most of the methods used to induce hypohydration are both uncomfortable and unfamiliar to the subjects, meaning that alterations in performance may be caused by this discomfort, rather than hypohydration per se. This review discusses these methodological considerations and provides an overview of the small body of recent work that has attempted to correct some of these methodological issues. On balance, these recent blinded hydration studies suggest hypohydration equivalent to 2–3% body mass decreases endurance cycling performance in the heat, at least when no/little fluid is ingested.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 92 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 225 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 225 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 42 19%
Student > Master 36 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 8%
Unspecified 14 6%
Researcher 10 4%
Other 41 18%
Unknown 64 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 77 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 11%
Unspecified 14 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 4%
Other 19 8%
Unknown 70 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2023.
All research outputs
#766,684
of 25,365,817 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#702
of 2,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,041
of 374,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#25
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,365,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,905 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,301 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.