↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of methods for selecting climate models to simulate future hydrological change

Overview of attention for article published in Climatic Change, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of methods for selecting climate models to simulate future hydrological change
Published in
Climatic Change, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10584-019-02512-8
Authors

Andrew C. Ross, Raymond G. Najjar

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 40%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 6 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 27%
Engineering 5 17%
Environmental Science 3 10%
Mathematics 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 8 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2019.
All research outputs
#2,387,775
of 23,172,045 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#1,797
of 5,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,612
of 366,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#45
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,172,045 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,831 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.