↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: Stable algorithm for event detection in event-driven particle dynamics: logical states

Overview of attention for article published in Computational Particle Mechanics, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Erratum to: Stable algorithm for event detection in event-driven particle dynamics: logical states
Published in
Computational Particle Mechanics, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s40571-016-0111-x
Authors

Severin Strobl, Marcus N. Bannerman, Thorsten Pöschel

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 2 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2016.
All research outputs
#18,453,763
of 22,865,319 outputs
Outputs from Computational Particle Mechanics
#113
of 293 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,856
of 299,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Computational Particle Mechanics
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,865,319 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 293 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,013 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.