↓ Skip to main content

Evolutionary convergence or homology? Comparative cytogenomics of Caesalpinia group species (Leguminosae) reveals diversification in the pericentromeric heterochromatic composition

Overview of attention for article published in Planta, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Evolutionary convergence or homology? Comparative cytogenomics of Caesalpinia group species (Leguminosae) reveals diversification in the pericentromeric heterochromatic composition
Published in
Planta, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00425-019-03287-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brena Van-Lume, Yennifer Mata-Sucre, Mariana Báez, Tiago Ribeiro, Bruno Huettel, Edeline Gagnon, Ilia J. Leitch, Andrea Pedrosa-Harand, Gwilym P. Lewis, Gustavo Souza

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 4 21%
Unknown 6 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 16%
Environmental Science 2 11%
Unspecified 2 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 6 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2019.
All research outputs
#18,036,345
of 23,172,045 outputs
Outputs from Planta
#2,065
of 2,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,744
of 366,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Planta
#11
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,172,045 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,745 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.